Saturday 10 April 2010

Echoes of the Rainbow

Hong Kong Film Industry after 1970's rapid development, it enters to the period of silence. Hong Kong's productions cannot gain great profit in 1990's. In past days, Hong Kong's films are popular in South Asia Market. Like Games Gamblers Play produced by Michael Hui broke the record of highest revenue in 1974. The Gross revenue was over six million Hong Kong dollars. But after 1990, Hong Kong film industry starts to step down.

From 1970s to now, Gangster movies, Chinese martial arts films and Comedy films are the successful film genre in Hong Kong production. But the setting and theme are totally different.

In Feb 2010, the Hong Kong local Film, Echoes of the Rainbow (歲月神偷), award of Crystal Bear in 60th Berlin International Film Festival. The film was taken place in Wing Lee Street in Sheung Wan, Hong Kong. After the award, people start to draw the concentration to this film. The magic point is after the film shows, people start to fight for keeping the buildings in Wing Lee Street to prevent urban re-development. But why does the film have power to turn down the policy?

The story is talking about a Hong Kong local family life in 1970s. It shows how Hong Kong classic citizen fight against with the difficult living status. The main actor is a pair of couple which works for making shoes. Basically, the story is not about Wing Lee Street. It may be because the story is touching, it calls many Hong Kong citizens collective memory. They re-think their child life. They find although the life status was worse than now, they were happier than now. It shows the gap between old generation and new generation in Hong Kong. The director, Alex Law, also claim that the society is full of a lot of negative energy in recent years. He wants to refill the positive energy to Hong Kong by this film.

A success film should have a perfect construction in iconography, setting, characters, theme and narrative. Echoes of the Rainbow makes it. It uses Moon cake club, street hair shop, corruption, the old theater, rooftop primary schools and the British flag to let audience back to 1970s. Also, by the story of Desmond (old brother), it reminds us 1970s is the century of elites. Like Desmond said, getting the first place means you won the competition, getting other places even second or third means you loss.

It may be because the setting of the film is so touching and familiar with each Hong Kong citizens, so many Hong Kong citizens like it. Since they love that period of time, they start to keep the street. Although the street is not representing all Hong Kong people childhood, Wing Lee Street become the icon of Hong Kong 1970s.

I like most parts of the film, especially the part of Desmond's story. In the film, Desmond was studying in English secondary school and he won a lot of awards. Even, he died, his funeral and cemetery was in British style. He looks like a elite but he is a member of lower class. It is a very big contradiction. It is representing how the director loves colonial style and colonial education. It is up sad that it is lack of opportunities for upward mobility from lower class nowadays. So, when Desmond get serious ill, he has to come to Beijing for medical treatment. In fact, I think the director wants us to rethink our relationship between past and now. So, I always think: We cry because we substituted into the role, not because we are incorporated into the story.

The successful formula of Hong Kong film was changed from 1970s. Other than iconography, setting, characters, theme and narrative, meaningful becomes the core part of formula.

Wong Chun Kit (10319224)

7 comments:

  1. Thanks Alex for posting the first review! Taking a recent film as the case study and applying certain theoretical concepts into your analysis, your observation and arguments are very inspiring. It’s good that you can express some inner reflections on the one hand, and situate the film in the larger social context at the same time.

    Just one little comment, I guess the successful formula of Hong Kong film doesn’t change much, what really changes is the socio-economic environment of Hong Kong. The so-called “formula of collective memory” always works, while it is acts like a “magic” when we lose our directions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Kathy Wong, Pak Wing15 April 2010 at 14:30

    I have also watched this film, no doubt that the director wants the audience to rethink the linkage between the past and the present, even the future, it is really a meaningful movie. However, I feel that it was such as a tear bomb after the half of the film. >___<~~~

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Alex!

    I love this movie as well and I agree to your point that this film is full of symbols of 1970s' Hong Kong. Although we weren't born at that period, we have a general picture in mind about the society at that time because our parents sometimes talk about how hard the life was in their youth.

    When I was watching "Echoes of the Rainbow", I thought of another film, "The City of Glass" because it is about a love story started in the 70s Hong Kong. Coincidentally, the director of "The City of Glass" is Alex Law's wife, Mabel Cheung. I think Alex and Mabel miss their youth and the 70s Hong Kong since both films have drawn the Hong Kong spirit and merit in the 70s- concerning the society and hard-working. I remember that I read an article about "Echoes of the Rainbow" wherein Alex has criticized the youth at the present time.

    However, I think the youth in Hong Kong now is not as bad as what the post-50's people say. The post-80's and post-90's youth are creative and liberal-minded. Somehow, I think there are merits and demerits in different eras. Yes, we miss the past and always think the past is the best. Our memory is just like Alex and Mabel's films- using the soft focus lens to romanticize the past and filter the demerits and dirt out of the past.

    Anyway, I hope everyone can learn from the past and appreciate the present.

    All the best,
    Florence

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Alex again!

    I'm sorry to tell you that I made a tiny mistake on your review. While I was trying to post a picture on my film review "Love in a Puff", I mistakenly posted it on your review!! Finally, I could remove the picture from your article but I found that the word format of the your review may change a little bit. Don't worry, I didn't delete or edit anything in your review but I'm afraid that the word format was different from the original one. I would like to help re-edit it if you think it is necessary to do so. Just feel free to tell me. Thanks and sorry.

    Flo

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi all!

    First, I would like to thanks all of your sharings and comments!

    Avin: The reason I think the“formula of collective memory”is differnet between now and past, is the "time they love" is different. In 1970s people's collective memory is "present time", they are famililar with their real time living enviroment. But now, people stop in the past time, they like the time in past. They grenerally think old memory is good because they can find their position from it. In certain degree, I agree that it is caused by the socio-economic environment of Hong Kong. And I strongly agree that it would be a crisis for Hong Kong. Do you think so?

    Florence: I agree that the youth in Hong Kong general is not as bad as what the post-50's people say. But the view and mind of the director is very observable, it is easily to make audience to think in this way. By the way, thank you for notice me that about the mistake. It doesn't matter. ^^

    Wong Chun Kit

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Alex!

    Nice pictures! ^o^
    I love the kid! He is very lovely!

    ReplyDelete